<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forcing and Non-Forcing Bids Pt.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/</link>
	<description>Bridge Bidding Practices and Theory for the Intermediate and Advancing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Scott</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-111</guid>
		<description>When partner opens I reply 1 heart,she must bid again..Isn&#039;t this corect???
When do you count distributional point? I know not in No Trump but what about opening a hand in a suit??    Thanks  Sheila Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When partner opens I reply 1 heart,she must bid again..Isn&#8217;t this corect???<br />
When do you count distributional point? I know not in No Trump but what about opening a hand in a suit??    Thanks  Sheila Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Lowe</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Much appreciated your article.  However, my question was which bids in bridge are forcing.  You did answer this in  respect of the opener (thank you) but not of the responder. I must assume that this is a very open question because every response seems to consist of a lerge number of words with no clear answer and much deviation of aim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much appreciated your article.  However, my question was which bids in bridge are forcing.  You did answer this in  respect of the opener (thank you) but not of the responder. I must assume that this is a very open question because every response seems to consist of a lerge number of words with no clear answer and much deviation of aim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Rosen</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-90</guid>
		<description>How many points are indicated by the 2NT bid in this sequence? 1C(S) 1H(W) P(N) 2H(E) 2NT(S)P P P. South had 19pts and North had seven pts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many points are indicated by the 2NT bid in this sequence? 1C(S) 1H(W) P(N) 2H(E) 2NT(S)P P P. South had 19pts and North had seven pts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the encouragement!

I plan on regrouping my efforts and posting on the blog on a regular basis!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the encouragement!</p>
<p>I plan on regrouping my efforts and posting on the blog on a regular basis!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: משחקים</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>משחקים</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-70</guid>
		<description>i rarely reply on blogs but due to your hard research i had to! keep it coming. 

**Small edit, if posting a link please make sure it the link and the tags represent the same information. 

-Cheers, The Admin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i rarely reply on blogs but due to your hard research i had to! keep it coming. </p>
<p>**Small edit, if posting a link please make sure it the link and the tags represent the same information. </p>
<p>-Cheers, The Admin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Good Question.

Transfers and Stayman are only on over auctions where the NT bid is the first natural bid by the partnership.  The three common auctions where Stayman and transfers are used:

1)	1NT (15-17)
2)	2NT (20-21)
3)	2C-2D*		*Notice how the 2C and 2D are an artificial platform to get to 2NT.
2NT(22-24)

When the partnership has had a natural auction that gets to either 1NT or 2NT then transfers and Stayman are OFF.  The two most common examples of these auctions are:

4)	1C-1H
1NT
5)	1D-1S
        2NT

In both of these auctions the Opener and Responder have bid naturally.  In the first auction the Opener showed 12-14 HCP,  and in the second auction the Opener showed 18-19HCP (the scenario that you directly asked about which we will now go over).

NOTE: Notice that the five examples above are the entire methodology of how Opener handles any hand that is balanced and has from 12-24 HCP

RESPONDERS REBID AFTER OPENER REBIDS 2NT

The first rule in this auction is that in standard all bids by Responder are forcing.
•	Responder can rebid their major to show 6 cards or longer in their major
•	Responder can rebid the other major to show 4+ cards in that suit
•	Responder can bid 3NT to end the auction
•	Responder can make a quantitative invite by bidding 4NT
•	Responder can bid partner’s major to create a force and look for the best game or slam.
•	Responder can bid the other minor (artificially)  which allows the Opener to show 3-card support for the major.


An example of these rules:
1C-	1S
2NT-	3C: Natural and Forcing
	3D: Artificial and asking if partner has 3-card support for spades
	3H:: Natural. Four or more hearts and five or more spades
	3S: Natural.  Six or more spades
	3NT: To Play
	4C: Gerber
	4H: Choice of games. At least 5/5 in the major.
	4S: To Play.
	4NT: Quantitative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Question.</p>
<p>Transfers and Stayman are only on over auctions where the NT bid is the first natural bid by the partnership.  The three common auctions where Stayman and transfers are used:</p>
<p>1)	1NT (15-17)<br />
2)	2NT (20-21)<br />
3)	2C-2D*		*Notice how the 2C and 2D are an artificial platform to get to 2NT.<br />
2NT(22-24)</p>
<p>When the partnership has had a natural auction that gets to either 1NT or 2NT then transfers and Stayman are OFF.  The two most common examples of these auctions are:</p>
<p>4)	1C-1H<br />
1NT<br />
5)	1D-1S<br />
        2NT</p>
<p>In both of these auctions the Opener and Responder have bid naturally.  In the first auction the Opener showed 12-14 HCP,  and in the second auction the Opener showed 18-19HCP (the scenario that you directly asked about which we will now go over).</p>
<p>NOTE: Notice that the five examples above are the entire methodology of how Opener handles any hand that is balanced and has from 12-24 HCP</p>
<p>RESPONDERS REBID AFTER OPENER REBIDS 2NT</p>
<p>The first rule in this auction is that in standard all bids by Responder are forcing.<br />
•	Responder can rebid their major to show 6 cards or longer in their major<br />
•	Responder can rebid the other major to show 4+ cards in that suit<br />
•	Responder can bid 3NT to end the auction<br />
•	Responder can make a quantitative invite by bidding 4NT<br />
•	Responder can bid partner’s major to create a force and look for the best game or slam.<br />
•	Responder can bid the other minor (artificially)  which allows the Opener to show 3-card support for the major.</p>
<p>An example of these rules:<br />
1C-	1S<br />
2NT-	3C: Natural and Forcing<br />
	3D: Artificial and asking if partner has 3-card support for spades<br />
	3H:: Natural. Four or more hearts and five or more spades<br />
	3S: Natural.  Six or more spades<br />
	3NT: To Play<br />
	4C: Gerber<br />
	4H: Choice of games. At least 5/5 in the major.<br />
	4S: To Play.<br />
	4NT: Quantitative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom watt</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>tom watt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I have 18 pts, we play 2/1 bal hand I bid 1 c part bids 1 h my short suit, I bid 2NT now the question is after I bid 2nt  systems are on just as if I had bid 1 nt. i.e. transfers etc  tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 18 pts, we play 2/1 bal hand I bid 1 c part bids 1 h my short suit, I bid 2NT now the question is after I bid 2nt  systems are on just as if I had bid 1 nt. i.e. transfers etc  tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strong Jump Shifts: Good agreements develop partnership Harmony &#171; Better Bridge Bidding</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Strong Jump Shifts: Good agreements develop partnership Harmony &#171; Better Bridge Bidding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] For a explanation of strong jump shifts check out my earlier post in: Forcing and Non-Forcing Bids Pt.4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a explanation of strong jump shifts check out my earlier post in: Forcing and Non-Forcing Bids Pt.4 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-9</guid>
		<description>You are correct. It is changed.

Thanks,
Corey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct. It is changed.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Corey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Wang</title>
		<link>http://betterbridgebidding.com/2010/02/04/forcing-and-non-forcing-bids-pt-4/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterbridgebidding.com/?p=46#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Opener Responder
1H 1S
2C 2H
3D* *showing extras and at least 5/5

I think here is a typo. Probably:
1H 1S
2D 2H
3D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opener Responder<br />
1H 1S<br />
2C 2H<br />
3D* *showing extras and at least 5/5</p>
<p>I think here is a typo. Probably:<br />
1H 1S<br />
2D 2H<br />
3D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

